|
New Developments
Enclosure should also be considered to
extend beyond the building envelope to address the transition from
personal to community space, and from artificial to natural environments.
The use of landscape elements to modify the environment is ancient
in origin. In the 1960s Victor Olgyay,
among many others, investigated bioclimatic design for comfort and
energy efficiency. Today, we know that a single layer of insulation
can impact energy efficiency to a greater extent than landscape
interventions. However, in the mediating zone between indoors and
outdoors (or between internal zones of a building), comfort and
delight can be achieved through the subtle
manipulation of soil, plants and water.
Important questions arise when architecture, landscape
and urban design are considered as nested layers of enclosure. Are
today's building too static and inflexible? Enclosure as environmental
mediator is premised on peoples' relationships with the outdoors
and each other. Looking at the constricting enclosures of conventional
office workers' cubicles, squashed between absolute floor separations,
and banded by inoperable windows, the answer is painfully obvious.
There remains much cause for optimism despite the numerous criticisms
leveled against modern architecture, particularly as it is revealed
through enclosures. Experiment with kinetic enclosures, hybrid ventilation
systems, enclosures which control light, sound and privacy are among
the many advances that regrettably populate only a small minority
of today's buildings.
Modern architectural science is accelerating the evolution
of enclosure from a monolithic barrier, through a functionally delineated,
composite assembly, and beyond to a fully articulated transition
from indoors to outdoors, or between adjacent internal spaces. As
we evolve our sense of enclosure, it is being discovered that architecture
can promote human health, well being and productivity without squandering
our limited resources and devastating the ecosystems which support
life.
Reinvigorating our principles of enclosure transcends
the realm of environmental separation where we seek to control phenomena
that threaten our primordial notions of shelter. It demands that
we recognize architectural enclosures as more than physical assemblies,
or as Thomas Berry has observed, "not a collection of objects
but a communion of subjects."
|