|
Overview
It is not always possible to fully accommodate
sustainability measures in buildings, whether it is for lack of
willingness on the part of clients, or an inability to reliably
integrate proposed designs in a workable fashion. There remain a
number of opportunities to cost-effectively lessen the environmental
impacts of building while improving the health and well being of
the occupants, and their community. In order to realize these opportunities,
it is necessary to acknowledge the value of design versus the application
of building conventions.
"Factoring all this in we found that in
the U.K., engineers have three times as many hours to design than
they do in the U.S. In the U.K., people have more time to do research
while they're practising, which makes an enormous difference not
only to the quality of design but also to the strength of links
between industry and research. Conversely, the lack of fees in the
U.S. tends to drive consultants to a more formulaic approach - hence
the reduction of codes to rulebooks rather than guides for good
practice to be exceeded by thoughtful design."
David Richards, Ove Arup and Partners, Engineers,
New York, 1996.
Based on research and recent precedents, a number
of opportunities for environmentally responsible design are available.
Many of these represent traditional approaches to buildings which
have been validated by time rather than environmental assessment
programs and tools. The listing below, which is neither comprehensive
nor exhaustive, identifies opportunities that may be realized in
practice today.
back to top
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bioclimatic Response
The idea of buildings "going with
the flow" and leveraging natural phenomena to provide healthful
and comfortable environments is ages old. It is being reinterpreted
within the context of contemporary building uses and available technologies.
Orchestrating buildings to take advantage of the sun and wind contrasts
sharply with conventional practice, where these phenomena are not
acknowledge, or worse, rejected (for example, why is the same type
of glazing used on all building orientations when the solar exposure
and light quality differ dramatically?). Respecting hydrology and
ecology, while harmonizing building operation with renewable energy
sources, represents a major step towards awareness of many related
opportunities.
|
 |
| Source:
Battle McCarthy Engineers, London, U.K. |
|
"The
microclimatic envelope reacts to internal and external conditions.
It opens up and closes. It remains in close contact with the external
environment due to its transparency, and its role as an intermediary
climatic space, both functionally and socially."
Gilles Perraudin, Architect
back to top |
 |
| Source:
Battle McCarthy Engineers, London, U.K. |
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Efficiency
We have the technology to substantially decrease non-renewable
energy demand in buildings, and it is sometimes possible to construct
buildings which are completely passive and do not rely on any active
systems for environmental control. Improvements to energy efficiency
involve decisions regarding the building envelope and services (electrical/mechanical).
Currently, insulation levels in practically all buildings are below
optimum levels, and fall further behind as the cost of energy, and
its associated environmental impacts, continue to escalate. Glazing
technologies offer us ample opportunity to significantly exceed
the performance of conventional windows and the incremental cost
of improvement is insignificant compared to future replacement necessitated
by soaring energy costs. The selection of efficient equipment, appliances
and lighting represent further opportunities to reduce life cycle
energy consumption.
back to top
|
|
| |
|
|
Daylighting & Natural Ventilation
Through the intelligent orchestration
of fenestration, the fundamental rights of occupants to light and
air may be respected in architecture. In Canada, we lack the standards
and legislation existing in some European jurisdictions needed to
mandate healthful indoor environments which promote occupant well
being. This should not discourage leadership in architectural design,
and there are sufficient precedents and typologies available to
deflect a better part of the higher design fees. Savings in energy
more than offset these higher fees, and numerous studies now confirm
that improved exposure to daylight and fresh air significantly increase
productivity, dwarfing the increased construction costs associated
with larger glazing areas and operable windows.
|
|
|
back to top
|
|
| |
|
|
Adaptability & Flexibility
Many buildings are demolished because they become outdated
and cannot economically accommodate new uses. A large proportion
of retrofit and renovation budgets is consumed by factors relating
to maladaptive and inflexible building forms. Clear spans with minimal
structural intrusions, accessible building services, and accommodating
access/egress paths are among the strategies which enable buildings
to affordably respond to changing occupancy. Adaptability and flexibility
considerations in building design require an examination of universal
typologies that express the fundamentals of form and function while
respecting the idiosyncrasies of temporal occupancy and cultural
purpose. An examination of those building types which have lent
themselves to several cycles of re-invention provides an interesting
contrast to many modern experiments.
|
|
|
back to top
|
|
|
Multifunctionality
Using one assembly or component to perform more
than one function (e.g., structural component is also the thermal
insulation, sound/fire separation, and interior/exterior finish)
can realize dramatic reductions in embodied energy. It affords more
sophisticated design and development if it is also durable and delivers
superior performance. The idea of multi-functionality has its modern
roots in Buckminister Fuller's concept of "ephemeralization"
which borrowed from nature's technologies so that our designs could
accomplish more with less human and resource expenditures. (Anecdotally,
Buckminster Fuller described ephemeralization as how one little
Telstar satellite weighing a few hundred pounds replaced 750,000
tons of transatlantic cable.)
|
|
| back
to top |
|
| |
|
|
Durability
The counterpoint to multi-functionality is durability. Improving
durability reduces recurring embodied energy and expenditures associate
with maintenance, repair and replacement. Achieving envelope durability
in cold climates translates into high levels of thermal insulation
placed outboard of the structure, and sufficient levels of airtightness
to prevent moisture migration by air leakage. Rugged, durable finishes,
furnishings, appliances and equipment should be selected to complement
the service life of the building structure and envelope. Otherwise,
the 'building as a system' will experience problems associated with
differential durability.
Differential durability is a term used to describe
how the useful service life of major building components, such as
structure, envelope, finishes and services, differs -both between
these components, and within the materials, assemblies and systems
comprising the components. Research indicates that with exception
to structural components, all of the other components require varying
levels of maintenance, repair and replacement during the life cycle
of the building. The extent and intensity of these recurring embodied
energy demands vary significantly, depending on how appropriately
the durability of materials, assemblies and systems are harmonized,
and how accessible they are for periodic maintenance, repair and
replacement.
|
|
|
|
|
According
to the U.S. Department of Energy's Technology Roadmaps, in 2020, building
envelopes will be:
Energy-positive - minimizing energy
use; providing heating, cooling, and electricity; and storing or returning
excess electricity to the grid.
Adaptable - designed for movable walls,
convertible rooms, and flexible systems to accommodate the changing
needs of occupants (e.g, newborns to seniors) and future technological
innovations.
Affordable - cost-effective in terms
of comprehensive home ownership, spanning first cost, maintenance
cost, life-cycle cost, and resale value.
Durable - offering enhanced safety
and resistance to natural hazards, including moisture, fire, and disaster,
as well as decreased maintenance.
Environmental - harmless to the natural environment, resource-efficient,
and appropriately balanced between embodied energy and durability.
Healthy and comfortable - harmless
to the well-being of construction workers and occupants and providing
good air quality and flow, thermal and visual comfort, natural ventilation
and light, and protection against fire, moisture, chemicals, radon,
and noise pollution.
Intelligent - using advanced sensors,
monitors, controls, and communication technologies to improve resource
efficiency, comfort, affordability, adaptability, durability, and
environmental harmony. |
|
| back
to top |
|
| |
|
|
Appropriate Material Selection
Material selection involves numerous considerations,
and applies equally to components, equipment, appliances and fixtures.
These may be either local or imported, standard or special, abundant
or rare. Similar criteria also apply to labour and expertise. It
makes little sense to specify materials and techniques that strain
the environment and the available work force.
Additional considerations include renewability, recyclability,
and reusability. The term renewable is applied to material which
can be replenished within its useful service life. Recyclable material
can be recycled for less real cost than was originally incurred
to produce it. Reusable material may be used in more than one configuration
or assembly over time (i.e., stone, brick, concrete block, etc.).
Further, the materials should not involve processes
that are harmful to the ecology or environment. For example, the
harvesting of wood is known to cause many harmful impacts, and it
is important to distinguish between sustainable resource management
practices and purely opportunistic depletions causing damage. As
importantly, materials should not adversely affect indoor air quality
by chemical emissions, or the harbouring of moulds and bacteria.
back to top
|
|
| |
|
|
Community Facilities & Resources
Reduction in multiplicity of facilities
and equipment within communities is a major facet of sustainability.
In Berkeley, California a tool library was established to enable
citizens to borrow tools free of charge, much as they borrow books.
The founders saw no distinction between knowledge tools (books)
and work tools (saws, hammers, ladders, etc.), and successfully
argued that these should be viewed as a community resource to avoid
the economic burden individual tool ownership would place on most
households.
In 1997, the Survey of Household Spending replaced
Statistics Canada's Household Facilities and Equipment Survey as
a source of information about Canadian dwelling characteristics
and household equipment. The latest surveys now also collect data
about the complete range of household spending on consumer goods
and services. Current data reveal that many household possessions
(especially tools) remain underutilized within the average Canadian
household. Analyses of the costs associated with our individualistic
emphasis on the consumption of goods and services strongly suggest
that the implications for resource depletion, and the economic impacts
on disposable household income, are staggering.
back to top
|
|
| |
|
|
On-Site Sewage Treatment
The centralization of sewage treatment in major
urban centres has caused many environmental and economic problems.
The cost of municipal sewage treatment, when externalities are considered,
is rapidly escalating. A number of ecological decentralized wastewater
management system (EDWMS) alternatives have been developed to serve
various applications. Where land is available for EDWMS, the potential
to re-use water and avoid serious environmental problems is now
accessible through proven technologies.
|
|
| back
to top |
|
| |
|
|
Stormwater Management
Water is vital to our existence and the
modern trend to dispose of it quickly and efficiently has caused
many problems, both environmental and economic. To the greatest
extent possible, stormwater is a valuable resource to be conserved
on our building sites for use in irrigation, non-potable applications,
and as a heat sink for space cooling.
New approaches to stormwater management have
been advocated for several decades, and a growing number of alternatives
are available. A major trend is towards the concept of landscape
as infrastructure. Conventional approaches to landscape serving
buildings tend to avoid any interaction with municipal infrastructure,
and the natural role of landscape as ecological infrastructure is
largely lost and forgotten. It is now possible to design landscape
elements which take advantage of zero-runoff and groundwater recharge
strategies. This approach fosters landscape elements designed to
create a rich livable environment with simple materials that produce
a long-lasting, self-sustaining urban landscape and infrastructure.
Landscape should be viewed as an active participant
in storm water management while also fulfilling its more traditional
function of microclimate modification through the control of sun
and wind exposures. In addition to fulfilling its aesthetic role,
landscape can echo the sense of community by actively reducing potable
water demand for plant irrigation, minimizing storm water management
costs, and improving the rate and quality of groundwater recharge.
back to top
|
|
| |
|
|
Renewable Energy
Investments in renewable energy technologies
have the potential to improve environmental quality and represent
an opportunity to generate future revenues. Renewable energy which
adheres to environmentally responsible standards is often referred
to as 'Green Power' to distinguish it from renewable sources such
as hydroelectricity that involve large scale social and environmental
interventions (e.g., James Bay project by Hydro Quebec). The following
insights on Green Power have been excerpted from The Pembina Institute
Green Power Guidelines for Canada (http://www.pembina.org).
Definitions of Green Power
usually have two primary characteristics:
· The electricity is
generated from renewable resources that do not compromise
the opportunity of future generations to gain access
to reliable, efficient, and affordable electricity supplies.
· The definitions promote the protection of human health
and environmental quality.
Green Power is electricity, generated from renewable
sources, that mitigates climate change by producing few or no greenhouse
gas emissions. It is generally further defined as having minimal
effect on:
· local and regional air quality
(hazardous air pollutants, particulate matter, and precursors
to the production of ground level ozone/smog, and acid rain);
· water quality;
· watersheds, river systems, and fisheries;
· flora and fauna;
· geophysical features;
· noise;
· visual esthetics; and
· any additional build-up of hazardous or toxic waste.
Most definitions of Green Power identify generation
technologies that minimize these impacts relative to conventional
electricity supply systems. Examples of specific technologies and
resources include:
· Solar - photovoltaics,
and thermal electric generators;
· Wind - individual turbines and wind farms;
· Environmentally-desirable and/or small-scale hydroelectricity;
· Wave and freestream tidal power stations and water velocity
turbines;
· Biomass-fired generators;
· Geothermal heat and power; and
· Other technologies that use media such as hydrogen, compressed
air or fuel cells to control, store and/or convert renewable
energy sources.
The opportunities for Green Power are continually
gaining ground in terms of technical and economic feasibility, and
will make it possible in the future to have energy positive buildings
that harvest power and revenue.
|
|
| back
to top |
|
|
Education
Often overlooked, or taken for granted,
education in architecture and its allied disciplines represents
a significant opportunity to advance sustainable design. Research
into areas such as architectural science and the transfer of emerging
technologies is critical to the survival of the professions and
the achievement of sustainability. As a minimum, the education of
architects should routinely evaluate the following environmental
effects associated with the design, construction and operation of
buildings:
· embodied energy in the building's
materials and construction;
· operating energy over the building's life time;
· use of renewable and non-renewable resources for construction
and operation;
· creation of waste and emissions in construction and operation;
· use of water in construction and operation;
· impact of the building construction and operation on biodiversity
and ecosystems;
· the comfort and health of occupants;
· impact of the building on the local community; and
· impact on the wider systems serving the building (e.g.,
transportion, water supply, etc.)
As we go beyond technological fixes to the sustainability
problem, and explore the need for appropriate cultural response
through buildings which encourage environmentally responsible owner
choices and occupant behaviour, the opportunities appear to far
outweigh the barriers. It remains to be seen if Canadian architecture
and its allied disciplines will be adequately positioned to deliver
sustainable solutions locally and globally. There is compelling
and growing evidence it will not be for a lack of opportunities.
back to top
|
|
| Refer
to Related Resources
+ References for further information about Sustainability Opportuntities. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|